Kansas Health Care Association and the Kansas Center for Assisted Living
In this Issue

January 23, 2009

Governor's Budget Freezes Rates for 2010!

 
  Association News

The Governor's recommendation reflects freezing the nursing home rates with the current methodology (in other words continuing with the 2005-2007 base period without rebasing), and a projected decrease in caseload.  In October the consensus caseload estimates were revised to $150.9 million SGF in anticipation of an increase in rates and a slight decrease in caseload. 

We are still evaluating what actions to take next.  The Reimbursement Sub-Committee and Government Affairs Committee will be meeting in the next few weeks to review ramifications of this rate freeze for 2010.  At this time, we have not been given any indications that the 2009 budget will be effected.

 

[ Return to top]

 

 

 
  KHCA/KCAL Winter Conference Around the Corner!

Join us February 24th and 25th in Topeka for the KHCA/KCAL Winter Conference.  This year's them is "Taking off the Mask!"  February 24th is Mardi Gras so our Legislative Reception will have a good "New Orleans" feel to it.  Click here for the brochure.

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  Financial Worksheet for Nursing Home Costs-tool

"How Do I Pay for My Nursing Home Care" brochure was recently developed with input from your association, SRS, KDOA and the Kansas Health Policy Authority to explain to your potential residents what their responsibility might be in paying for their nursing home bill.   The Planning for Nursing Home Care worksheet is a companion to the brochure for you to use in visiting with potential residents.

Brochure page 1

Brochure page 2

We will have copies of both of these available at the KHCA Winter Conference in February, but you are welcome to start using any of them.

For questions, contact Cindy cluxem@khca.org

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  KCAL coordinator hired

Joleen Klausman hired as KCAL coordinator

A part-time position dedicated to KCAL membership has been added to the KHCA staff.  Joleen Klausman, an RN and former assisted living director in Topeka, will assist with membership recruitment, KCAL education, regulatory issues and member communication.  Questions or comments may be sent to joleenk@khca.org.

 

[Return to top]

 

 

National News

 
  Five-Star Rating –New Information from CMS

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is giving nursing home providers another preview of the Five-Star Quality Rating data as this is a relatively new program. 

Please visit your Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) mailbox now (available through your electronic connection to the State servers for submission of Minimum Data Set [MDS] data) to review your results.  To access these reports, select the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) link located at the bottom of the Home page.  Once in the CASPER Reporting system, click on the 'Folders' button and access the Five Star Report in your 'st LTC facid' folder, where st is the 2-digit postal code of the state in which your facility is located, and facid is the state assigned identifier of your facility.

Although Nursing Home Compare is generally updated on the 3rd Thursday of the month, we have built in a one-week delay to allow you time to review your rating prior to the Website's update. 

We have also reinstituted the help desk at 1-800-839-9290 which will be open from 9 to 5 EST through January 30, 2009 to address any concerns.

New Technical Guide released, January 2009.

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  CMS updates
Life Safety Code

The information below was sent to the association by Katherine Achor for distribution.

LSC Questions and Answers from the Meeting December 2, 2008
Review of 1st qtr 2008 and 3rd qtr 2008 2567’s

1. K18-construction of doors and latching

Q: Small hole in door frame?
A: Correct in that it should have been cited since the hole would not resist the passage of smoke.

NFPA Standard: Doors in corridor walls of sprinklered buildings shall be constructed to resist the passage of smoke and shall be provided with suitable means of keeping the doors closed. Doors in non-sprinklered buildings shall have doors constructed to resist the passage of smoke for at least twenty minutes and shall be provided with suitable means of keeping the doors closed. Doors should not be blocked open by furniture, doorstops, chocks, tiebacks, drop-down or plunger-type devices, or other devices that necessitate manual unlatching or releasing action. Friction latches or magnetic catches that release when the door is pushed or pulled are acceptable. Clearance between the bottom of the door and the floor covering shall not exceed 1 inch. 2000 NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.1 and 19.3.6.3 and CMS S&C Letter 07-18


2. K62-automatic sprinkler-sprinkler system maintenance

Q: Storage 18 inches below or within of a sprinkler head?
A: AHCA says yes as long as storage is along wall and not directly below sprinkler head.  Tom Jaeger says: The 18" rule does not always apply to storage along the perimeter of the room, see extract from 1999 NFPA 13, 5-6.6 below.
The 18-in. (0.46-mm) dimension is not intended to limit the height of shelving on a wall or shelving against a wall in accordance with 5-6.6.  Where shelving is installed on a wall and is not directly below sprinklers, the shelves, including storage thereon, can extend above the level of a plane located 18 in. (0.46 mm) below ceiling sprinkler deflectors.  Shelving, and any storage thereon, directly below the sprinklers cannot extend above a plane located 18 in. (0.46 mm) below the ceiling sprinkler deflectors.
3. K62-automatic sprinkler-sprinkler system maintenance
  
   Q: % or # of spare sprinkler heads Providers are required to have?
   A: Per CMS-need to follow 1999 NFPA 13, 3-2.9.1, 3-2.9.2, 3-2.9.3.

A supply of spare sprinklers (never fewer than six) shall be maintained on the premises so that any sprinklers that have operated or been damaged in any way can be promptly replaced. These sprinklers shall correspond to the types and temperature ratings of the sprinklers in the property. The sprinklers shall be kept in a cabinet located where the temperature to which they are subjected will at no time exceed 100°F (38°C).

A special sprinkler wrench shall also be provided and kept in the cabinet to be used in the removal and installation of sprinklers.

The stock of spare sprinklers shall include all types and ratings installed and shall be as follows:
       (1) For systems having less than 300 sprinklers, not fewer than six sprinklers
       (2) For systems with 300 to 1000 sprinklers, not fewer than 12 sprinklers
       (3) For systems with over 1000 sprinklers, not fewer than 24 sprinklers

4. K147-electrical wiring

Q: Amount of area around the electrical panel needs to be clear? 
A: A three foot area around the panel needs to be clear so that there is easy access to the panel.

NFPA Standard: Sufficient space shall be provided and maintained about electric equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment. Where energized parts are exposed, the minimum clear work space shall not be less than 6½ feet high or less than 3 feet wide. In all cases, the work space shall be adequate to permit at least a 90 degree opening of doors or hinged panels. 1999 NFPA 70, Article 110-32

5. K25-smoke partition construction

Q: Is it in regulation that access needs to be on both sides of the smoke barrier partition?
A: Safe access needs to be provided to enable barriers to be inspected and to provide facility staff access to work.

6. K50- Fire Drills

Q: LSC states that FIRE DRILLS SHOULD BE HELD AT UNEXPECTED TIMES UNDER VARYING CONDITIONS. 

A: KSFMO will cite providers for not random or unexpected times if you hold a fire drill the first day of the month every quarter and if you do not vary your time more than 2-3 hours.

Q: What is the definition of unexpected times?
A: Drills should be conducted throughout shifts and should not show a pattern (same time of day, same day of the month).

Q: Why do providers have to do a scenario?
A: Scenarios ensure that drills are performed under varying conditions – such as the size, type, location and timing of the fire. Important to have someone else help relay information back to the Administrator on how staff and residents performed during the fire drill and for the administrator to include this in his/her scenario.

Q: Activation of fire alarm by employees?
A: Staff should activate the fire alarm system.

NFPA Standard: Requires drills be conducted at least quarterly on each shift under varied conditions to simulate the unusual conditions occurring in case of fire. The fire alarm shall be transmitted during drills although a coded announcement may be used between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2000 NFPA 101, 18/19.7.1.2

7. K144-generators inspected/tested

Q: Where do annunciator panels need to be if following 2000 code? At nurses station?
A: They need to be in a place that is constantly attended so KSFMO such as the nurse’s station.

Per CMS, if a provider is installing new generator or providing a major upgrade they would need to follow the 2000 LSC, 1999 NFPA 70, 1999 NFPA 110, and 1999 NFPA 99 - otherwise they would follow the code when their generator was installed.

8. K46-emergency lighting

Q: If you have a generator where is emergency lighting required?
A: If the generator supplies emergency power, then battery powered emergency lighting is required at the generator.

NFPA Standard: Emergency battery light for task illumination at the generator set location shall be provided. 1999 NFPA 99, 3-4.2.2.2, 3-5.2.2.2 and 3-6.2.1

Q: Is emergency lighting required in a med room if you have a generator?
A: Not if the med room lights are powered by the generator.
A: Emergency lighting should not require manual operation (such as being switched.)

NFPA Standard: The emergency lighting system shall be arranged to provide the required illumination automatically in the event of the interruption of normal lighting, opening of a circuit breaker, or a manual act, including accidental opening of a switch controlling normal lighting facilities. 2000 NFPA 101, 7.9.2.2

 

9. K134-Eyewash-Emergency shower

Q: Should any eyewash documentation or other be cited by FM using K134?
If so then what specifically do providers need to comply with?  FM started writing eyewash and only documentation issues, now they write for tepid water, requires more than one motion to operate, being behind locked doors…? 
A: This is currently under review by CMS. 

10. K12-Construction type

Q: Overhang and sprinklers?  Are sprinklers required under overhangs on the exterior of the building?
A: Yes, if the overhang is of combustible construction and the overhang is 4 ft or greater in width.

NFPA Standard: Requires complete sprinkler coverage for all parts of a facility with construction type V (111). 2000 NFPA 101, table 18/19.1.6.2

NFPA Standard: Sprinklers shall be installed under exterior roofs or canopies exceeding 4 feet in width. Sprinklers can be omitted where the canopy or roof is of noncombustible or limited combustible construction. 1999 NFPA 13, 5-13.8.1

NFPA Standard: Limited Combustible refers to a building construction material that has a potential heat value not exceeding 3500 Btu/lb where tested in accordance with NFPA 259, and includes materials having a structural base of noncombustible material, with a surfacing not exceeding a thickness of 1/8 inches that has a flame spread index not greater than 50; and having neither a flame spread index greater than 25 nor evidence of continued progressive combustion, and of such composition that surfaces that would be exposed by cutting through the material on any plane would have neither a flame spread index greater than 25 nor evidence of continued progressive combustion. 2000 NFPA 101, 3.3.118

Q: Can a waiver be submitted?
A: Yes a waiver can be submitted or you can use the FSES to establish equivalence, but waivers or use of the FSES will not be allowed for sprinkler deficiencies after August 13, 2013.


MISC

1. Documentation cites-K69,K130,K62,K46

Providers cited for documentation not being readily and immediately available?  Federal surveyors allow the provider to fax in documents why can’t the state?  Two providers were cited twice for this when the documentation was in the book but misfiled. One of the providers IDR’d and KSFMO denied it. KSFMO said that all LSC surveys should start with an entrance interview.  It was brought to KSFMO’s attention that this was not happening.  KSFMO will instruct all their inspectors to begin with an entrance interview.  If during this interview you determine that some of your documentation is out of order, the inspector should allow you to gather this information by the exit interview and not cite you.  You have to have the documentation in order before the inspector leaves.

2. K69 documentation

Q: What is the timeframe for maintenance to be done-if something needs to be checked every 6 months is there any leeway? 
A: Per CMS they should give you a few days or so after the 6 month date before citing the kitchen hood systems. Any other maintenance checks need to be completed within the time frame.

3. Assisted living facility

Q: Inspected by FM-Does kitchen hood suppression need to be connected to fire alarm system? Yes

Q: Overhang is 50 inches does it need to be sprinkled?  It is attached to the building and no cars underneath it?
A: Yes, Yes

Q: Sprinklers in freezers?
A: Yes

4. Waivers

Q: Is CMS or KSFMO granting waivers?
A: Per CMS any waivers under 6 months the KSFMO will grant and any over 6 months CMS Region 7 reviews. We have asked CMS for the statute where this is cited.

5. IDR’s

In 2007 there were 23 IDR’s total and 23 total tags were IDR’d.  Of these, 61% were removed and 39% stand.

In 2008-Jan1 through Oct 1 there were 23 IDR’s initiated involving 35 total tags. Of these, 49% were removed and 51% stand.

KHCA will have the KSFMO update the membership on the LSC IDR process at Winter Conference.  KHCA will encourage all providers to use the IDR process.

6. Clarification on keypad doors and posting of the code?

A: Per CMS as long as you are giving cognitively aware residents the code, the staff the code and any visitors the code, you should not be cited for this deficiency.  Posting of the code mirrors the requirement to post the SOD. Some providers have posted signs next to their keypad doors that state visitors need to check in at the front desk.  This is where they would get the code.  Some providers have stated that they give the code to their cognitively aware residents and document it in their chart.
  
Delayed egress - the above does not apply and provider must post appropriate signage reading push until alarm sounds door will open in 15 seconds.

7. Why do they think that Kansas is 2-3 times higher than the national average on the top ten deficiencies cited?
  
A: CMS does not know why the citation rate is greater in Kansas. We are very interested in doing the quarterly calls with the associations to identify and address inconsistencies and to provide updates to the nursing home providers in Kansas. It is always better to prevent noncompliance rather than cite it. To that end, we see a lot of repeat noncompliance in Kansas, so we will concentrate on addressing those areas. 

8. Tom Jaeger asked CMS about the high incidence of providers being cited for K62
Not having the 5 year obstruction investigation?

A: Per Tom, under NFPA 25, a 5 year obstruction investigation is only needed if there is an obstruction. CMS responded that providers would be cited if the inspector found decreased flow or pressure drops as well as if the sprinkler contractor's report said that an obstruction investigation needs to be done in 5 years. Tom explained to CMS that sprinkler contractors will get the business so that it is in their best interest to put this in the paperwork. Make sure if you are cited for this that you ask the inspector why? If they cite the contractors paperwork (in the absence of an obstruction) then be sure to IDR it.
  
A: Per CMS – ask the contractor to state the reason they recommend the 5 year obstruction investigation in your paperwork. Items addressed as deficient in the sprinkler system documentation are required to be promptly corrected by the facility.

NFPA Standard: The owner or occupant promptly shall correct or repair deficiencies, damaged parts, or impairments found while performing the inspection, test, and maintenance requirements of this standard. Corrections and repairs shall be performed by qualified maintenance personnel or a qualified contractor. 1998 NFPA 25, 1-4.4
      
       Chapter 10 Obstruction Investigation
This chapter provides the minimum requirements for conducting investigations of fire protection system piping for possible sources of materials that can cause pipe blockage.
To ensure that piping remains clear of all obstructive foreign matter, an obstruction investigation shall be conducted for system or yard main piping wherever any of the following conditions exist:
       (a) Defective intake for fire pumps taking suction from open bodies of water
       (b) The discharge of obstructive material during routine water tests
       (c) Foreign materials in fire pumps, in dry pipe valves, or in check valves
(d) Foreign material in water during drain tests or plugging of inspector’s test connection(s)
       (e) Plugged sprinklers
(f) Plugged piping in sprinkler systems dismantled during building alterations
(g) Failure to flush yard piping or surrounding public mains following new installations or repairs
       (h) A record of broken public mains in the vicinity
       (i) Abnormally frequent false tripping of a dry pipe valve(s)
(j) A system that is returned to service after an extended shutdown (greater than 1 year)
(k) There is reason to believe that the sprinkler system contains sodium silicate or highly corrosive fluxes in copper systems
(l) A system has been supplied with raw water via the fire department connection.
  
  
9. Many providers were cited for green sprinkler heads. The brass oxidizes to
   form the green film and per CMS will only cite you if it is heavy.
  
NFPA Standard: Sprinklers shall be inspected from the floor level annually. Sprinklers shall be free of corrosion, foreign materials, paint, and physical damage and shall be installed in the proper orientation (e.g., upright, pendant, or sidewall). Any sprinkler shall be replaced that is painted, corroded, damaged, loaded, or in the improper orientation. 1998 NFPA 25, 2-2.1.1
  

10. Tom asked CMS about the high incidence of providers being cited for penetration
   of the ceiling. In general Tom stated that 84% of the homes are sprinkled in
Kansas and are one story buildings and their ceilings would not be part of a fire rated assembly so therefore you should not be cited. You should only be cited for penetration of the ceiling if the ceiling is part of a fire rated assembly. KSFMO will speak to their inspectors about this issue.

 


[Return to top]

 

 

 
  Open Door Forum

CMS -- Next SNF/LTC ODF Call 
 
The next SNF/LTC Open Door Forum call is scheduled for January 29, 2009 at 2 PM Eastern time. To get into the call, Dial: 1-800-837-1935 & Reference Conference ID: 70014598. CMS asks participants to dial in 15 minutes before the call is scheduled to begin. Encore is an audio recording of this call that can be accessed by dialing 1-800-642-1687 and entering the conference ID, 70014598, beginning 2 hours after the call has ended and expires Wednesday, February 4, 2009. The recording expires after 3 business days.
 

 

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  DMEPOS Fact Sheet
Bidding process starts again

CHANGES TO THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, PROSTHETICS, ORTHOTICS, AND SUPPLIES
 (CMS 1561-IFC)

Overview

The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), enacted on July 15, 2008, made limited changes to the Medicare Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) Competitive Bidding Program.  Certain changes to this program are addressed in the Interim Final Rule with Comment Period that was announced today.  CMS will be implementing in other rulemaking or sub regulatory guidance those provisions of the legislation that do not affect the rebidding of Round 1 and will announce additional information as it becomes available.

Background

The Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program was established by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“Medicare Modernization Act” or “MMA”) to provide important benefits to Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers, including lowering out-of-pocket costs and savings for the Medicare program. Under this program, bids submitted by DMEPOS suppliers are evaluated so that suppliers that are awarded contracts will ensure access to certain DMEPOS items and services and enhance quality and customer service for Medicare beneficiaries. These bids are used to establish single payment amounts for certain DMEPOS items in competitive bidding areas (CBAs). Under the MMA, competitive bidding programs were to be phased into the Medicare program beginning in 2007.  CMS began competition for Round 1 in 10 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and 10 product categories of DMEPOS and successfully implemented the program on July 1, 2008.  Medicare’s single payment amounts resulted in a projected savings of approximately 26 percent compared to the traditional Medicare fee schedule. This provided substantial savings for Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers.

The Competitive Bidding Program was delayed by the passage of MIPPA.  As a result, the contracts with DMEPOS suppliers under the program were terminated, and the payment for competitively bid items and services was reinstated to the Medicare fee schedule amount.

This Interim Final Rule with Comment Period implements certain provisions of MIPPA which affect the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program.  In particular, it addresses the delay of Rounds 1 and 2 of the program. This rule also includes the following:

* Excludes certain areas and items and services from the competitive bidding program;
* Establishes a “covered document” review process for providing feedback to suppliers regarding missing financial documents;
* Requires DMEPOS suppliers that are awarded a contract under the program to disclose to CMS information regarding subcontracting relationships; and
* Makes an exemption to the competitive bidding program for certain providers.

Delay of the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program

MIPPA delayed the competition for Rounds 1 and 2 from 2007 and 2009 to 2009 and 2011, respectively. Competition for a national mail order program is delayed until after 2010 and competition in additional areas, other than mail order, is delayed until after 2011.  The competition for Rounds 1 and 2 must be for the same MSAs and items and services as were previously selected by CMS.  However, Puerto Rico and negative pressure wound therapy are excluded from the Round 1 rebid, and group 3 complex rehabilitative power wheelchairs are permanently excluded.  MSAs and items and services that will be included in the Round 1 rebid are identified in this rule.

Round 1 rebid will occur in the following MSAs:

• Cincinnati – Middletown (Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana)
• Cleveland – Elyria – Mentor (Ohio)
• Charlotte – Gastonia – Concord (North Carolina and South Carolina)
• Dallas – Fort Worth – Arlington (Texas)
• Kansas City (Missouri and Kansas)
• Miami – Fort Lauderdale – Miami Beach (Florida)
• Orlando (Florida)
• Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania)
• Riverside – San Bernadino – Ontario (California)


Round 1 rebid will include the following product categories:
• Oxygen Supplies and Equipment
• Standard Power Wheelchairs, Scooters, and Related Accessories
• Complex Rehabilitative Power Wheelchairs and Related Accessories (Group 2)
• Mail-Order Diabetic Supplies
• Enteral Nutrients, Equipment and Supplies
• CPAP, RADs, and Related Supplies and Accessories
• Hospital Beds and Related Accessories
• Walkers and Related Accessories
• Support Surfaces (Group 2 mattresses and overlays) in Miami
Suppliers wishing to participate in the Round 1 rebid Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program, including suppliers that were awarded contracts in the first Round 1 which occurred in 2007, will need to submit a new bid application for the Round 1 rebid competition that will occur in 2009. As in the first Round 1 program, suppliers will still be expected to meet all applicable eligibility, financial, quality, and accreditation standards.

Feedback on Missing Financial Documents

Suppliers that submit financial documents within a specified time period will be notified by CMS of any missing financial documentation. This notice does not include a review of the accuracy of the documents submitted or whether the documents meet applicable requirements.  It only applies to the receipt of the documents.  These financial document requirements will be detailed in the Request for Bids (RFB).

Documents must be received by the later of (1) the date that is 30 days before the final date for the closing of the bidding window or (2) the date that is 30 days after the opening of the bid window.  For example, for a 60 day bid window the last date to submit documents and receive a notice of any missing documents would be the later of: (1) 30 days before the final date of the bid window or (2) 30 days after the beginning of the bid window.
 
This period, as defined by MIPPA and in the Interim Final Rule with Comment Period, is called the “covered document review date.”  In the 2009 Round 1 rebid, CMS will provide notification of missing financial documents within 45 days after the end of the covered document review date to those suppliers that submit their financial documents under this timeframe.  For all subsequent rounds of competition, CMS will have 90 days after the end of the covered document review date to provide this notification.  Once suppliers are notified of the missing document(s), suppliers have 10 business days from the date of the notice to submit the missing document(s).

Disclosing Information on Subcontracting Relationships

A supplier that is awarded a contract under the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program must provide information to CMS on each subcontracting arrangement the supplier has to furnish items and services under the contract.  The supplier must also provide information on whether each subcontractor meets accreditation requirements, if applicable to the subcontractor.  The supplier must provide all of this information within 10 days after the supplier enters into the contract with CMS under the program.  If the supplier enters into a subcontracting relationship after being awarded a contract under the competitive bidding program, the supplier has 10 days from entering into the subcontracting relationship to provide this information to CMS.

Exemption from Competitive Bidding for Certain Durable Medical Equipment (DME)

MIPPA requires an exemption for certain DME when furnished by a hospital to its own patients during an admission or on the date of discharge.  This exemption applies to the same items that are exempt when furnished by physicians to their own patients as part of their professional services.  These items are crutches, walkers, canes, folding manual wheelchairs, blood glucose monitors, and infusion pumps that are DME.  Services provided under this exemption will be paid at the single payment amount established for the items.

CONCLUSION

Other than the delay to the program, this regulation only includes provisions that affect the Round 1 rebid of the competitive bidding program. There are other provisions of MIPPA that affect this program that are not addressed in this Interim Final Rule with Comment Period.  Although the competitive bidding program has been delayed and some other limited changes to the program have been made, none of these changes fundamentally alter the nature of the competitive bidding program.  As a result, CMS still expects significant savings for Medicare beneficiaries, the taxpayers and to the Medicare program as well as improved access to quality DMEPOS items and services when the program resumes.

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  RAI updates from CMS

RAI Panel Q&As
Assessment Questions

Question – I understand that if a facility misses an assessment and discovers it shortly thereafter, they should do an assessment with a current ARD now.  For example, if a facility missed an April quarterly assessment and discovered it in May, they would do a quarterly in May and transmit.  They would be out of compliance with the assessment schedule for the period from April until the assessment was done in May.  Correct?
Answer – YES, that is correct.  Additionally, the facility would have gotten a warning error message saying that the quarterly assessment was late.

Question - What if a facility does not discover that they missed an assessment for many months?  Let’s say they do a quarterly in May and an annual in August on a resident.  Then, they discover that the quarterly that was due in February was never  done.  What do they do?

Answer – There is nothing to do at this point – just get back on schedule; the next quarterly would be due in November.  If an assessment has been missed and it is now time to do another assessment, the facility needs to complete the one that is due now and forget the old one. 
AHFSA RAI Panel 08/07/2008

Question – The facility found they didn't do an admission assessment when they got ready to do their quarterly.  I know they can't backdate nor create an assessment that wasn't done.  Do they now do a comprehensive assessment for their quarterly and get a warning that it is out of sequence or will there be other consequences?

Answer - We are glad you sought clarification.  The facility needs to complete a full assessment (admission)as soon as possible. They cannot go back and recreate the assessment from the missing time period. The AB1-Date of Entry, would be the actual admission date but the ARD would have to be current. They will be considered out of compliance with the requirements for the time period that a valid assessment was not present, so the sooner they can establish a new assessment reference date (ARD) and complete the assessment the better. They should also document in the resident's record, to explain why it was being done that way.

There may also be state specific requirements that apply to these types
of situations that will need to be considered in addition to the federal
requirements.


G1b(B) ADL Support Provided
Question – When using a sit to stand lift, if 1 person is operating the lift for a transfer, would G1b(B) be coded “3” (ADL Support Provided - two person transfer)?  Would the lift itself be count as a person, as well as the person running the lift?

Answer –  No, a standing lift is an assistive device, not a person.

I1z   Quadriplegia

Question – In the September 2007 ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting, “Functional Quadriplegia” was defined as “the inability to move due to another condition (severe contractures, arthritis, etc.) and functionally the patient is the same as a paralyzed person."  Would this include a resident with dementia who is bedridden, or frail, or in the end stage of life?

Answer –  New ICD-9 diagnostic codes in the Symptom chapter have been proposed but currently there is no such diagnosis as functional quadriplegia.  It is the responsibility of the physician, not the billing or medical records department, to provide the correct diagnoses.
Regardless of the cause, if the physician is willing to provide the diagnosis of quadriplegia, and it meets the rest of the criteria, it can be coded under I1z.
 
Section M

Question -  If a hematoma was surgically removed, does it then become a surgical wound?
Answer – On page 3-166 (M4g) says a surgical wound includes “healing and non-healing, open or closed surgical incision, skin graft or drainage site on any part of the body.”  If surgery was performed, then we would assume it would be reasonable to code it as surgical wound.

Question - A resident was run over with her car; How would you code this type of wound?

Answer - We don't have enough information to respond to this.  Were there bruises, abrasions, skin tears, broken bones?  Was surgery involved?
The resident should be assessed for the wounds that were received during this accident and then all wounds should be coded accordingly.  For example if she sustained a hip fracture then it would be coded in section J – If the injuries don’t fit elsewhere, then code the injury at I3.

______________________________________________________________________________
Section P


P1ac or O3 for Intrathecal Injection
Question - Should an intrathecal injection (no IV tubing is used and there is no artificial "port" to use) be coded at P1ac?

Answer - The RAI Manual states that epidural, intrathecal and baclofen pumps can be counted at P1ac. If this had been an intrathecal pump, the rationale in the manual suggests that it be coded under P1ac(IV Medication) because the continuous administration of a substance would require frequent monitoring.
Given the circumstances in the example, the intrathecal injection directly into the site, without a port or a pump, would not
count per the manual. This was just one injection and would be coded under O3(Injections).


P1a(d)   Chest Tube Excretions

Question - When a resident has a chest tube, is the volume of fluid collected from the chest tube included in the output? 

Answer - If there is clinical documentation showing monitoring and measurement of the chest tube excretions for at least 3 consecutive shifts, then it can be coded at P1a(d).

Compound Fracture
Question - Resident fell & fractured femur. No surgery at the time of fracture.  The bone then worked through the skin for a compound fracture. The resident is not a surgical candidate & refused surgery.  The resident is now in traction & the fracture has been reduced. 
Sections I and J4 should be coded. Should this scenario be coded elsewhere?
Answer - The facility will want to consider P1a(e) – Monitoring Acute Medical Condition.  This resident is a poor candidate for surgery and/or is refusing surgery and, where there had been some sort of mobility, this person is now on full bed rest.  Certainly there is a greater risk for a number of issues including pressure ulcers, so it would seem reasonable that this resident will require much closer monitoring and preventative measures put in place.

P1b(e) Psych Therapy

Question –  Can a MSW employed by the facility, code the physician ordered psychological therapy minutes she provides that is over and above her role as the facility social worker? The facility MDS coordinator thinks this would not be acceptable since she works for the facility and doesn't have a Medicare provider I.D. and these minutes would increase their RUG scores. 

Answer – The keyword here is "licensed mental health professional.” In Chapter 3 at P1b(e), the RAI Manual lists a psychiatric social worker as an example of a licensed mental health professional. The manual also specifies that if the state doesn't license a category of professionals, then the services provided by that individual cannot be coded for this item. The panel does not believe a Medicare provider I.D is relevant to the issue and Psychological therapy is not a RUG item.


P3j Rehabilitation/Restorative Care

Question - Can a restorative program(P3j)be coded when the deficit is a language barrier(only speaking a foreign language)? The RAI manual mentions functional communication skills, but does this include a language barrier? 

Answer –On page 3-54, the manual differentiates between speaking a different language versus having a functional problem.  At P3j, the MDS is meant to capture Nursing restorative/rehab programs - often initiated after formalized physical, occupational, or speech rehabilitation therapy. Speech therapists are not involved in teaching foreign languages. If this person has no "functional" speech impediment & the only problem is "communication," then communication issues are captured in Section C.

Extra RAPs

Question - "May I complete a RAP even if it is not triggered?"

Answer -  See pages 1-13 to 1-14 of the RAI Manual, and a reference to the determining factor for the RAP process can be found on page 4-5, item #4, where it states: "Based on the review of assessment information, the interdisciplinary team decides whether or not the triggered condition affects the resident's functional status or well-being and warrants a care plan intervention." Also, the manual states the RAP process may be applied to triggered and non-triggered items and even to items that are not listed - see item #2 same page. ~~The key words here are "warrants a care plan intervention." The facility must make the clinical judgment in this area.

“I” Care Plans
Question - I have briefly mentioned the “I” care plans in training. My attendees want to know if CMS will be looking for them to be used in the near future.
Answer - On page 4-26 of the RAI Manual, it says, “It is not the intent of this chapter to specify a care plan structure or format.”  Beginning on page 4-29, the manual also directs the reader to the care planning requirements at the specified F Tags. 
In accordance with F279, a care plan must be oriented toward preventing avoidable decline and have measurable objectives.  The Panel agrees that done correctly, the “I” care plans do have an individualized approach.  However to this point, CMS has chosen not to dictate the format of the plan of care and we do not believe that stance will change.

RAI Version 2.0 Q&As
October-November 2008

New Facility & MDS Data Collection

Question:
We are in the process of getting the rest of the beds in our facility certified for Medicare and Medicaid. So, currently, we have residents in beds that are not certified and their MDS assessments have been done per OBRA guidelines but not submitted to the database.
My question is the following:
When we do get the confirmation that all the beds in the facility are certified beds for Medicare and Medicaid will we need to submit an Admission MDS for each of these residents who do not have an Admission MDS in the database (and then follow a new OBRA schedule for their MDS assessments) or do we just change their sub req to "3" and start submitting MDS assessments where ever their current OBRA schedule falls?
Answer:
For the OBRA schedule there should be a new comprehensive assessment close to the date of certification (Admission) to get started and those assessments have to be done at the time of the certified date or close to it - that will start the MDS clock for the OBRA assessments. Please read 1-16 regarding newly certified nursing homes under 1.11 - Facility Responsibilities for Completing Assessments.  You can't take old assessments and just change the Sub Req # to get them submitted. 

The facility will have to wait until they get their Medicare Provider number before they can start accepting PPS residents and then can follow the guidelines: 1. Necessary 3-day qualifying hospital stay and 2. Medically necessary skilled services are needed on a daily basis with physician's documentation.  They can't collect data prior to the Medicare certification date, because they can't put a resident in a bed that is not certified unless they are ready to submit.

G6 Siderails for Mobility
Question: We have installed a Halo Safety Ring which is attached to the mattress frame and fits snug against the mattress. 
These do not prevent any freedom of movement for the residents; it enables them to have more independence in their bed mobility and transfers.
<>The issue is how to appropriately code the Halo Safety Ring on the MDS.  Section G6b states 'bedrails used for bed mobility or transfer'.  Would you consider the Halo Safety Ring in the same category as a 'bedrail' which would allow a score on G6b? 
 
Answer:  Based on the intent and definition, the RAI Panel members believe the Halo Safety Ring can be coded at G6, provided the resident uses the ring for bed mobility or transfer.  As with all devices, it must be evaluated on an individual basis for risks and benefits.
AHFSA RAI Panel  11/24/2008


Questions on Section K
K5c - Mechanically Altered Diet

Question:  Currently the definition for “Therapeutic Diet” in the RAI Manual version 2.0, does not include mechanically altered diets.  However, in the newly revised F325 tag, (eff: 9-1-08), the definition of mechanically altered diets is now included in the definition of the therapeutic diet.  I have been telling the providers that until the new MDS version is out, to continue completing the MDS as it is written, following the 2.0 instructions.  HOWEVER, I have heard that some providers had contacted CMS directly, and were told to start coding the MDS now, with the new definition. 

Answer:   The RAI User’s Manual, currently the 2.0 version, has always been the source for coding the MDS, and this has not changed.  You are correct in telling the providers that they need to continue to code item K5c according to the current RAI manual.  This concept is also true with the revised F314 (eff: 11-12-04) which clearly expects facilities to provide care and services that are based in the current standards of practice but the MDS requires coding based on old standards that are reflected in the manual.

 Section M

M1 Deep Tissue Injury

Question: One of our state LTC Nurse Consultants attended a Pressure
Ulcer Consortium in Kansas (9/2008).  She stated that a representative of CMS advised attendees at a break out session to code a deep tissue injury with no open areas as a stage IV,  Have there been any written clarifications from CMS regarding staging a DTI?
How do you code suspected deep tissue injuries?  

Answer:   Suspected deep tissue injuries were discussed during the August Open Door Forum because CMS had been made aware of facilities coding them at Stage 1 or Stage 4.    Currently there is no way to document a suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) on the MDS 2.0 at item M1.  The facilities should be directed to refer to the RAI Manual definitions for each stage and code what is known – not what is suspected.  Code based on the observed appearance of the area and whether or not it matches any of the definitions of the various stages described in the manual. The facility should also document in the resident's clinical record if they suspect the resident has a deep tissue injury.

SDTIs can be coded on MDS 2.0 at I3, and on the billing UB.  Effective October 1, 2008, the ICD9CM codes were updated. As part of this update, there are new codes for different ulcer stages, including suspected deep tissue injury and unstageable. The update can be found at:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/ftpse...htm#guidelines


In addition, deep tissue injuries are a projected part of the MDS 3.0 coding.

Questions on Section P

MDS 2.0 Section P4d - Restraints
 
Question: I have another question to bring to the panel from one of our state's nurse consultants.  Regarding a manual hold.......has CMS given any clarifications regarding a hold to prevent movement of an arm during a blood draw?  I assume this would be coded under P4d, but thought I would check with you, just in case there has been a CMS update, that I am not aware of. 
Answer: The AHFSA RAI Panel has reviewed your question and do not believe that this scenario would be considered a restraint.  However, if the facility wanted to code this scenario if it occurred within the look-back period they could do so, but there should be a good restraint assessment according to the regulations and documentation as is required with any restraint.  There has been no CMS guidance regarding this situation.  


P8 Physician orders

Question: When the facility activates a standing order or a facility protocol, does that day count that as a day for physician order changes? The facilities activates the standing orders / facility protocols & then has the physician sign the order.

I know PRN orders are not counted. Standing orders are defined
as: Physician orders pre-established and approved for use by nurses and
other professionals under specific conditions in the absence of a
physician.

Answer:  As with PRN orders, the list of standing orders has already been written and “the potential need for the service had already been identified.”  As you indicated, the standing orders had been “approved for use.”  There is no change to the order simply because it has been implemented, so notifying the Dr. that the order was activated does not constitute a new or changed order and may not be counted for this MDS item.

 

 


[Return to top]

 

 

 
  Training with WPS available

WPS Medicare will be hosting two Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Billing seminars in February-March 2009: one in Ames, IA on February 18 and one in Des Moines, IA on March 3.  Based on the location, we thought these seminars would interest providers in your associations.  We would appreciate if you could advertise these seminars to billing staff at your skilled nursing facilities.

Both seminars will cover roughly the same material: SNF Consolidated Billing, SNF Parts A & B billing, Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) Program, etc.

However, the seminar in Ames, IA is directed towards J5 providers (those who did not formerly bill to Mutual of Omaha), and the seminar in Des Moines, IA is directed towards Legacy providers (those who did formerly bill to Mutual of Omaha).  This difference means that addresses, phone numbers, website links, and Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) discussed will be different at each seminar.

Thank you for your help!  Information about these two seminars is below:

1. SNF Billing Seminar on 2/18/09
Holiday Inn Ames, Conference Center, 2609 University Boulevard, Ames, IA  50010; (515) 268-8808
$36.00 per person (includes breakfast, lunch, and seminar materials)
Register by 2/11/09 at: http://wpsmedicare.com/mac/education/partaseminars.shtml#snf
Questions?  Contact Aileen Sigler, WPS Outreach Analyst, at (402) 351-6419

2. SNF Billing Seminar on 3/3/09
Holiday Inn Airport, 6111 Fleur Drive, Des Moines, IA 50321; (515) 287-2400
$46.00 per person (includes breakfast, lunch, and seminar materials)
Register by 2/23/09 at: http://www.wpsmedicare.com/part_a/education/seminars.shtml#snf
Questions?  Contact Elizabeth Uraga, WPS Outreach Analyst, at (402) 351-3783

Elizabeth A. Uraga, Outreach Analyst
WPS Medicare Provider Outreach and Education
elizabeth.uraga@wpsic.com
(402) 351 - 3783


[Return to top]

 

 

 
  Medicare Consumers using Oxygen

We have received two communications from CMS concerning Medicare recipients using oxygen.  And new rules for how Medicare pays oxygen suppliers.

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  RUG Based Case-Mix Adjusted Nurse and Aide Staffing Minute Estimates

You will find an excel spreadsheet with all the details.

[Return to top]

 

 

 
  Issues related to Liability Notice and Beneficiary Appeal Rights-S&C

Appeal Notice

Current SNF Notice Structure

Survey Protocol for compliance with Liability Notice and Beneficiary Appeal Rights

For questions: cluxem@khca.org

[Return to top]

 

 

Kansas Health Care Association - 117 SW 6th, Suite 200, Topeka, Kansas 66603, Phone 785-267-6003, Fax 785-267-0833, email: khca@khca.org